biotar,
Thanks, but \"making sense\" and being ridiculous, stupid, or combative are slightly different things.
Steven,
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D (three dimensional volume) from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small ones -in producing the sense of volume and space.
biotar,
Thanks, but \"making sense\" and being ridiculous, stupid, or combative are slightly different things.
Steven,
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D (three dimensional volume) from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small ones -in producing the sense of volume.
biotar,
Thanks, but \"making sense\" and being ridiculous, stupid, or combative are slightly different things.
Steven,
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D (three dimensional volume) from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small one to produce the sense of volume.
biotar,
Thanks, but \"making sense\" and being ridiculous, stupid, or combative are slightly different things.
Steven,
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D (three dimensional volume) where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small one to produce the sense of volume.
biotar,
Thanks, but \"making sense\" and being ridiculous, stupid, or combative are slightly different things.
Steven,
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small one to produce the sense of volume.
biotar,
Thanks, but \"making sense\" and being ridiculous or stupid are slightly different things.
Steven,
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small one to produce the sense of volume.
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too. The large ones seem more-so than the small one to produce the sense of volume.
I don\'t think those completely lack \"3D\". They just aren\'t subject specific 3D where only one subject, focus point, or object is affected by it. I get a sense of 3D from these in a slightly different way than those but it\'s still there - fairly strongly too.
JMO
Jan 23, 2010 at 07:02 AM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #8040642 « what is '3d' ? »
