So, one could suggest that in a digital realm (where ultimately each individual pixel could be theoretically drawn or manipulated one by one without a camera or lens to achieve or emulate anything), that ...
the lens capability / design then determines the baseline from which one can begin the alteration process ... with some lenses producing a \'closer to goal\' starting point than others ... depending on the drawing style of the given lens and the intended goal. (The level of willingness & effort to alter, subjective & variably noted.)
However, in a chrome / film realm (or non-alterated digital), it would seem the dependency on the inherent design characteristics of the lens remains quite significant. Case in point how Leica vs. Zeiss typically approaches transition in their designs.
I think I\'m about 99.9% good on the significance of lens design relative to the 3D (& other) issue.
So, one could suggest that in a digital realm (where ultimately each individual pixel could be theoretically drawn or manipulated one by one without a camera or lens to achieve or emulate anything), that ...
the lens capability / design then determines the baseline from which one can begin the alteration process ... with some lenses producing a \'closer to goal\' starting point than others ... depending on the drawing style of the given lens and the intended goal. (The level of willingness & effort to alter, subjective & variably noted.)
However, in a film realm (or non-alterated digital), it would seem the dependency on the inherent design characteristics of the lens remains quite significant. Case in point how Leica vs. Zeiss typically approaches transition in their designs.
So, one could suggest that in a digital realm (where ultimately each individual pixel could be theoretically drawn or manipulated one by one without a camera or lens to achieve or emulate anything), that ...
the lens capability / design then determines the baseline from which one can begin the alteration process ... with some lenses producing a \'closer to goal\' starting point than others ... depending on the drawing style of the given lens and the intended goal. (The level of willingness & effort to alter, subjective & variably noted.)
However, in a film realm (or non-alterated digital), it would seem the dependency on the inherent design characteristics of the lens remains quite significant.
So, one could suggest that in a digital realm (where ultimately each individual pixel could be theoretically drawn or manipulated one by one without a camera or lens to achieve or emulate anything), that ...
the lens capability / design then determines the baseline from which one can begin the alteration process ... with some lenses producing a \'closer to goal\' starting point than others ... depending on the drawing style of the given lens and the intended goal.
However, in a film realm (or non-alterated digital), it would seem the dependency on the inherent design characteristics of the lens remains quite significant.
