RustyBug wrote:
Bifurcator ... first you say that the consensus is that lens design doesn\'t matter [THAT MUCH], then you say that we\'ve all agreed that it does.
It\'s just not the most critical factor is all I meant. I\'m pretty sure I made that VERY clear several times now.
jcmarney wrote:
I think you are missing my point there. Switch Zeiss out in my last post for any other brand. The lens only contributes to some factors of what makes an image 3D, not all. In addition, SOME factors that give the 3D appearance can indeed be altered after the shot is made, such as color, saturation, and apparent sharpness. Some cannot, such as light, perspective, oof rendering, and sure, micro-contrast.
Edit: And yes, I find the rending of some lenses more to my liking that others. I might even say some bolster the 3D characteristics of an image, if those characteristics are ALREADY present in the image. The 135mm L is an example that was given that I agree with....as well at the 35mm L.
Yes, exactly.
RustyBug wrote:
Please stop being a fence jumping arbitrary instigator.
Bifurcator has the floor ... I bow to anything & everything he says from now and forever more.
WTF? No need to be condescending or combative.
Jan 18, 2010 at 08:36 PM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #8022310 « what is '3d' ? »
