philber,
Processing can and does add information. It can also subtract. And it can modify without add or subtract operations as well. With enough processing you can turn a white blank page into a photorealistic image limited only by your imagination.
Samuli Vahonen wrote: I already gave up (I get pimples and shivers when I even mention the \"definitions\" word these days) - I see it as two separate things, which I have stated already so many times - some other people want to put all of these to one thing - some of the people decline to believe there is thing number 2 - etc. - etc. - I no longer could care less, for me they are: - classic art cues for 3D
- 3D-ish feeling / 3D look / 3D-ish, whatever it\'s named, I\'m happy with whatever name forum comes up for this.
I hear ya. I agree with your definition here too BTW.
biotar wrote:
Guess I really am to serious about all this. What got into me...
Well I hope the technicals are serious. Just not the emotions that get involved as we promote our own opinions. I\'m sorry I brought that retrospective into the conversation if that only exacerbates it.
philber,
Processing can and does add information. It can also subtract. And it can modify without add or subtract operations as well. With enough processing you can turn a white blank page into a photorealistic image limited only by your imagination.
Samuli Vahonen wrote: I already gave up (I get pimples and shivers when I even mention the \"definitions\" word these days) - I see it as two separate things, which I have stated already so many times - some other people want to put all of these to one thing - some of the people decline to believe there is thing number 2 - etc. - etc. - I no longer could care less, for me they are: - classic art cues for 3D
- 3D-ish feeling / 3D look / 3D-ish, whatever it\'s named, I\'m happy with whatever name forum comes up for this.
I hear ya. I agree with your definition here too BTW.
Jan 18, 2010 at 07:49 PM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #8022078 « what is '3d' ? »