And a consensus obviously makes it so ... thereby \'proving\' Columbus was wrong about the world being round, since the consensus was that the world was flat.
The Title of the forum is \"Alternative Gear & Lenses\", so I\'m not sure why the strong opposition to Richard, Paul, Paul, et al . . . indication that the significance of the gear is warranted.
The \'scissors & thread\' shot is with an Oly, and I\'ve got a Mamiya lens that I can use as a \'go to\' lens for some 3D-ish as well ... i.e. not a Zeiss Zealot, simply recognizing there are lenses that Zeiss makes which I find to produce 3D with great results & consistency. I\'m certain that if Graham & others were to chime in here, they\'d have some killer work that was equipment dependent too. Makten has shown some nice things with his 85mm that is not a Zeiss, but it\'s drawing style does lean toward some 3D tendencies.
Leica makes an APO lens that is on my dream list as well for the 3D-ish, while other Leicas don\'t ... so this discussion is not about \"Zeiss Zealots\" but the fact that lens design has an integral part (all other aspects being equal) of the 3D effect. Canon\'s 135/2 L has been known to post up some good 3D renderings ... again, lens design matters.
Jan 18, 2010 at 06:38 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #8021749 « what is '3d' ? »
