Bifurcator wrote:
It sounds like elitist hogwash to be frank and I think this thread has shown that beyond any question.
CHALLENGE: PUT UP THE PICS ... that have more 3D than the Zeiss 21 with another 21.
Or, if you prefer ... go head to head against 100/2 with another 100mm.
Since my budget doesn\'t provide for owning BOTH of these lenses, I\'ll gladly welcome anything that comes close as an option to put in my bag.
Richard & others have gone to GREAT LENGTHS with significant investment of TIME & $$$ into this area. For those of us who have tremendous appreciation for their efforts ... you\'ll have to PROVE it before we will subscribe to rhetoric folly. We are inclined to be highly receptive to more alternative options for producing the 3D-ish effect that we desire, so here\'s your chance ... GO FOR IT
The lens itself may help a little but I highly doubt it - unless it\'s a really crappy lens,
If you were to compare the OM 100/2 against the Zeiss 100/2 you would no longer have this viewpoint. LENSES HAVE DRAWING STYLES ... and it would be VERY OBVIOUS of the differences between these two lenses ... neither of which is \'crappy\' by a longshot, just different.
Richard ... could you post the motorycycle shot in this thread (vs. my link to it)?
Bifurcator wrote:
It sounds like elitist hogwash to be frank and I think this thread has shown that beyond any question.
CHALLENGE: PUT UP THE PICS ... that have more 3D than the Zeiss 21 with another 21.
Or, if you prefer ... go head to head against 100/2 with another 100mm.
Richard & others have gone to GREAT LENGTHS with significant investment of TIME & $$$ into this area. For those of us who have tremendous appreciation for their efforts ... you\'ll have to PROVE it before we will subscribe to rhetoric folly. We are inclined to be highly receptive to more alternative options for producing the 3D-ish effect that we desire, so here\'s your chance ... GO FOR IT
The lens itself may help a little but I highly doubt it - unless it\'s a really crappy lens,
If you were to compare the OM 100/2 against the Zeiss 100/2 you would no longer have this viewpoint. LENSES HAVE DRAWING STYLES ... and it would be VERY OBVIOUS of the differences between these two lenses ... neither of which is \'crappy\' by a longshot, just different.
Richard ... could you post the motorycycle shot in this thread (vs. my link to it)?
Jan 18, 2010 at 10:08 AM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #8019697 « what is '3d' ? »
