Bifurcator wrote:
OK, show me. I don\'t agree. Every image here critically depends on both the depth and the placement of the DOF range(s).
Since not my own images I\'ll just link to page where there are two images which are \'3d\' but have everything sharp: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/785634/1
- cogitech\'s classic castle shot at writing #4
- bobring\'s cityscape with some tables & chairs in front area of picture at writing #21
I didn\'t find many of my own, which would not have used DOF as part of 3D, and don\'t have really good examples. I have shoot past years mainly with normal lens and short tele lenses, and I\'m trying to leard wide angle lenses and large DOF.
\"The Tampereen Tuomiokirkko (cathedral) 1\" (Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZE @ f/5.6, 5s)
Jan 11, 2010 at 02:11 PM
Previous versions of Samuli Vahonen's message #7992555 « what is '3d' ? »
