wickerprints wrote:
Under this criterion, *any* lens has the potential to be overrated, even a good one. It\'s not a mark against the absolute performance, which could very well be superior to another lens. It\'s just that people seem to value it out of proportion to its actual abilities.
This is the point I was trying to make earlier about the comparison between the 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2 and 135 f/2. The 135 f/2 is almost 3x more expensive than the 100 f/2, but is it almost 3x better?
Dec 22, 2009 at 06:00 PM
Previous versions of kakomu's message #7919321 « Most overrated Canon lens. »
