fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of kakomu's message #7918868 « Most overrated Canon lens. »
  

kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Most overrated Canon lens.


droopy1592 wrote:
check photozone.de

85 f/1.8 is NO good in high contrast shots with tons of purple fringing
100 f/2 is marginally better but it\'s no 135 L

No good? I beg to differ. Even the photozone.de review begs to differ.


Dec 22, 2009 at 03:58 PM
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Most overrated Canon lens.


droopy1592 wrote:
check photozone.de

85 f/1.8 is NO good in high contrast shots with tons of purple fringing
100 f/2 is marginally better but it\'s no 135 L

No good? I beg to differ. Even the photozone.de review begs to differ.


Dec 22, 2009 at 03:56 PM
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Most overrated Canon lens.


droopy1592 wrote:
check photozone.de

85 f/1.8 is NO good in high contrast shots with tons of purple fringing
100 f/2 is marginally better but it\'s no 135 L

No good? I beg to differ.


Dec 22, 2009 at 03:51 PM
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Most overrated Canon lens.


droopy1592 wrote:
check photozone.de

85 f/1.8 is NO good in high contrast shots with tons of purple fringing
100 f/2 is marginally better but it\'s no 135 L

No good? Did you actually look at any 85 f/1.8 pictures? The purple fringing is slight even in high contrast pictures.


Dec 22, 2009 at 03:50 PM
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Most overrated Canon lens.


droopy1592 wrote:
check photozone.de

85 f/1.8 is NO good in high contrast shots with tons of purple fringing
100 f/2 is marginally better but it\'s no 135 L

Oh, you mean the smidgen of purple fringing that is shown in only one real world example? Yea, I guess that does mean the 135 f/2L is worth 3x the price of the 85 f/1.8. It\'s not like the 135 f/2 has any chromatic aberration or purple fringing, right?


Dec 22, 2009 at 03:49 PM
kakomu
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Most overrated Canon lens.


droopy1592 wrote:
check photozone.de

85 f/1.8 is NO good in high contrast shots with tons of purple fringing
100 f/2 is marginally better but it\'s no 135 L

Oh, you mean the smidgen of purple fringing that is shown in only one real world example? Yea, I guess that does mean the 135 f/2L is worth 3x the price of the 85 f/1.8.


Dec 22, 2009 at 03:47 PM





  Previous versions of kakomu's message #7918868 « Most overrated Canon lens. »