Theresa_N wrote: wickerprints wrote:
Wow, there is just so much misinformation in this thread about IS that it\'s not even funny.
To hear all these people go on about lens IS being nothing more than a holdover from the film days and/or an excuse for larger profit margins, really does a disservice to the research that went into this technological development. It also reflects paranoia and ignorance.
I think your paranoia is evident in your trolling about. I won\'t even bother arguing with you, you should just go back to your nikcan group and talk about how much you love your own camera. Why are you here in the alternative group promoting in lens stabilization when it isn\'t even available in alternative solutions? I cannot help but label you a troll.
You must be new around here.
This thread is about the Sony A900, which has in-body IS. Then people in this forum make false statements about the justification for lens-based IS, for which I provided a logical counterargument. Now you\'re calling me a troll simply because you disagree but can\'t provide a coherent rebuttal.
Frankly, there are people with multiple systems around here. Nobody should be confined to a particular subforum on the basis of statements that are not confined to a single system, as is the case with image stabilization technology.
Dec 22, 2009 at 07:17 AM
Previous versions of wickerprints's message #7917220 « Where the A900 really shines »
