here ye go, Jerry. I won\'t do any more of them. I can say some were not acceptable to me, so I don\'t have much time right now but pulled these out of my files and uploaded them. I used to spend alot of time reviewing cameras or my lenses, but it\'s just not worth the time involved.
And each situation of light is different in BIFs, so you can\'t just set up a tripod and do a dumb tripod test at 10 ft. away. ;~) Even those can be inaccurate and like I said, different light can really misconstrue reality, when it comes to tests. You will have to judge for yourselves. I shot these hawks two days in a row one with my MKIII and one with my new 7D, and I had more quality photos with my MKIII. Keep in mind though, the lighting was different each day. So this is not to judge the camera. Getting used to a camera, it\'s best assets takes some time. All the cameras are excellent if you learn them well.
The first one is from the MKIII, processed, but one of the sharpest hawks I\'ve gotten in years. Again, the light was excellent. Below they are all 7D, which I\'ve only spent one day with on BIFs.
one from my MKIII barely processed:
A few from my 7D [different lighting] plus the links will give you full size non processed 7D photos:
hope the links to larger size work, to see full size originals:
[link[url=http://www.ocwildlife.com/Photography/Raptors/7DHawksBIF-029/741404294_u2xDS-O.jpg[/link]
here ye go, Jerry. I won\'t do any more of them. I can say some were not acceptable to me, so I don\'t have much time right now but pulled these out of my files and uploaded them. I used to spend alot of time reviewing cameras or my lenses, but it\'s just not worth the time involved.
And each situation of light is different in BIFs, so you can\'t just set up a tripod and do a dumb tripod test at 10 ft. away. ;~) Even those can be inaccurate and like I said, different light can really misconstrue reality, when it comes to tests. You will have to judge for yourselves. I shot these hawks two days in a row one with my MKIII and one with my new 7D, and I had more quality photos with my MKIII. Keep in mind though, the lighting was different each day. So this is not to judge the camera. Getting used to a camera, it\'s best assets takes some time. All the cameras are excellent if you learn them well.
The first one is from the MKIII, processed, but one of the sharpest hawks I\'ve gotten in years. Again, the light was excellent. Below they are all 7D, which I\'ve only spent one day with on BIFs.
one from my MKIII barely processed:
A few from my 7D [different lighting] plus the links will give you full size non processed 7D photos:
hope the links to larger size work, they don\'t, so just copy the url and put in addy bar for originals
[link]http://www.ocwildlife.com/Photography/Raptors/7DHawksBIF-029/741404294_u2xDS-O.jpg[/link]
and
[link]http://www.ocwildlife.com/Photography/Raptors/7DmkIII-541/741270799_uVehe-O.jpg[/link]
Dec 15, 2009 at 01:51 AM
Previous versions of Netgarden's message #7891305 « Comparing my 7D to MKIII+BIFpics »
