Re: do u prefer flash photography or available light?
There are situations when I use a flash but only if I can bounce it from white ceiling or walls. I tried diffusers but I never liked the effect I was getting. Taking a picture with a flash in church, for instance, ruins the mood completely.
What would happen if a flash had been used here:
here
or here (if someone knows Cathedral of Saint Patrick in NYC, one understands what kind of light is there)
Re: do u prefer flash photography or available light?
There are situations when I use a flash but only if I can bounce it from white ceiling or walls. I tried diffusers but I never liked the effect I was getting. Taking a picture with a flash in church, for instance, ruins the mood completely.
What would happen if a flash had been used here:
here
or here (if someone knows Cathedral of Saint Patrick in NYC, one understands what kind of light it is there)
Re: do u prefer flash photography or available light?
There are situations when I use a flash but only if I can bounce it from white ceiling or walls. I tried diffusers but I never liked the effect I was getting. Taking a picture with a flash in church, for instance, ruins the mood completely.
Re: do u prefer flash photography or available light?
There are situations when I use a flash but only if I can bounce it from white ceiling or walls. I tried diffusers but I never liked the effect I was getting. Taking a picture with a flash in church, for instance, ruins the mood completely.
Re: do u prefer flash photography or available light?
There are situations when I use a flash but only if I can bounce it from white ceiling or walls. I tried diffusers but I never liked the effect I was getting. Taking a picture with a flash in church, for instance, ruins the mood completely.
Dec 06, 2009 at 08:23 AM
Previous versions of mfurman's message #7857441 « do u prefer flash photography or available light? »
