Just to refute the argument that only pro bodies can produce that famed \"3-D Effect\", would you care to post some of your images that make the subject \"pop\", taken using non-pro (Rebels, xxD) bodies? I\'d like to see if there\'s any truth to this or if it\'s all in the head of the people who keep saying such things. Not to diss any pro or pro body, but crop bodies need defending, IMHO. Please mention the lens used as well.
Recently, I read someone\'s post in another thread that 1 series bodies produce an image that has an \"almost 3-d effect\" and is unmatched by any crop. When I asked whether that has more to do with the lens or the body and I posted a photo I took with my lowly 30D, which I think kinda shows this so-called \"makes the subject pop\" effect. His reply was \"yeah, that\'s why the 30D is the top model picked by pros\". While that is funny, I believe a good lens and a capable person can produce equally good photos with even a D30. That\'s why I\'m curious to see if anyone else thinks that a pro body has a different quality that makes subjects \"pop\" or gives an \"almost 3-D effect\" or if it is just a matter of the lens, the DOF and the subject-background distance, etc?
Just to refute the argument that only pro bodies can produce that famed \"3-D Effect\", would you care to post some of your images that make the subject \"pop\", taken using non-pro (Rebels, xxD) bodies? I\'d like to see if there\'s any truth to this or if it\'s all in the head of the people who keep saying such things. Not to diss any pro or pro body, but crop bodies need defending, IMHO. Please mention the lens used as well.
Recently, I read someone\'s post in another thread that 1 series bodies produce an image that has an \"almost 3-d effect\" and is unmatched by any crop. When I asked whether that has more to do with the lens or the body and I posted a photo I took with my lowly 30D, which I think kinda shows this so-calld \"makes the subject pop\" effect. His reply was \"yeah, that\'s why the 30D is the top model picked by pros\". While that is funny, I believe a good lens and a capable person can produce equally good photos with even a D30. That\'s why I\'m curious to see if anyone else thinks that a pro body has a different quality that makes subjects \"pop\" or gives an \"almost 3-D effect\" or if it is just a matter of the lens, the DOF and the subject-background distance, etc?
Just to refute the argument that only pro bodies can produce that famed \"3-D Effect\", would you care to post some of your images that make the subject \"pop\", taken using non-pro (Rebels, xxD) bodies? I\'d like to see if there\'s any truth to this or if it\'s all in the head of the people who keep saying such things. Not to diss any pro or pro body, but crop bodies need defending, IMHO. Please mention the lens used as well. Thanks.
Nov 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM
Previous versions of saaketham's message #7813410 « 3-D "effect" from non pro bodies? »
Please mention the lens used as well. 
While that is funny, I believe a good lens and a capable person can produce equally good photos with even a D30. That\'s why I\'m curious to see if anyone else thinks that a pro body has a different quality that makes subjects \"pop\" or gives an \"almost 3-D effect\" or if it is just a matter of the lens, the DOF and the subject-background distance, etc?