There\'s a pic of a 1 series on here where the lens is still attached to the mount and the entire magnesium body pulled apart!
yes, you must mean that one pic I had posted a while ago.
Trust me, it takes alot to break the mount of a camera. In the worst case, the fins holding the lens in will snap off as they are designed to in an effort to minimize damage.
A lens-side mounting ring is held down by a few screws and is cheap to replace, the camera mount isn\'t.
oh yeah, the camera in the above pic is a 1D mark II with some sort of 400/500mm L ... attached?
There\'s a pic of a 1 series on here where the lens is still attached to the mount and the entire magnesium body pulled apart!
yes, you must mean that one pic I had posted a while ago.
Trust me, it takes alot to break the mount of a camera. In the worst case, the fins holding the lens in will snap off as they are designed to in an effort to minimize damage.
A lens-side mounting ring is held down by a few screws and is cheap to replace, the camera mount isn\'t.
oh yeah, the camera in the above pic is a 1D mark II with some sort of 400~500mm L ... attached?
There\'s a pic of a 1 series on here where the lens is still attached to the mount and the entire magnesium body pulled apart!
yes, you must mean that one pic I had posted a while ago.
Trust me, it takes alot to break the mount of a camera. In the worst case, the fins holding the lens in will snap off as they are designed to in an effort to minimize damage.
A lens-side mounting ring is held down by a few screws and is cheap to replace, the camera mount isn\'t.
oh yeah, the camera in the above pic is a 1D mark II with what appears to be a 400mm f/5.6 L ... attached?
Nov 19, 2009 at 09:50 AM
Previous versions of Kolor-Pikker's message #7794459 « Lens mount strength? »
