Before I get to my question, I want to make it clear that I am not trying to fan any flames here between those that have posted (sometimes contentiously) about the 7D\'s \'mazing issue\'. Without turning this thread into a back-and-forth arguement, I genuinely want to understand how to \'see\' the \'mazing\' that\'s been discussed ad nauseum.
My question/observation is the following: I\'ve had my 7D now for just a few days and I haven\'t seen any \'mazing\' as has been described in multiple posts here. However, I did notice that when I view a RAW image beyond 100%, I can see the actual pixels of the image. I\'m not saying that some people are not genuinely having a problem but I do want to fully understand what I should look for. At low ISO on an OOF area, all I see @ 100% (using DPP) is OOF (with maybe just a few sharpening artifacts). When I view @ 200%, I see alot of blocky pixels so I don\'t know what difference any \'mazing\' would make at this point. Is the \'mazing\' pattern larger, smaller, or the same size as the blocks of pixels?
Before I get to my question, I want to make it clear that I am not trying to fan any flames hear between those that have posted (sometimes contentiously) about the 7D\'s \'mazing issue\'. Without turning this thread into a back-and-forth arguement, I genuinely want to understand how to \'see\' the \'mazing\' that\'s been discussed ad nauseum.
My question/observation is the following: I\'ve had my 7D now for just a few days and I haven\'t seen any \'mazing\' as has been described in multiple posts here. However, I did notice that when I view a RAW image beyond 100%, I can see the actual pixels of the image. I\'m not saying that some people are not genuinely having a problem but I do want to fully understand what I should look for. At low ISO on an OOF area, all I see @ 100% (using DPP) is OOF (with maybe just a few sharpening artifacts). When I view @ 200%, I see alot of blocky pixels so I don\'t know what difference any \'mazing\' would make at this point. Is the \'mazing\' pattern larger, smaller, or the same size as the blocks of pixels?
Omar
Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Previous versions of omarlyn's message #7786282 « 7D & 'Mazing' (serious question) »