i need to get a different focusing screen for my 5d to make manual focusing easier on my alternative lenses without AF, which screen should i get the ee-s precision matte or the split image focusing screen. ive used my friends film milnolta with the split screen and sometimes i felt like it would take too long to acquire something in focus(maybe its just me, and i didn\'t have enough practice with it?) is the ee-s easier to use? what do you guys prefer, any thoughts opinions? should i get both and see which ones works better for me?
edit:
not sure how much darker the ee-s screen is but i don\'t own any zooms and all my primes are slower then f2
i need to get a different focusing screen for my 5d to make manual focusing easier on my alternative lenses without AF, which screen should i get the ee-s precision matte or the split image focusing screen. ive used my friends film milnolta with the split screen and sometimes i felt like it would take too long to acquire something in focus(maybe its just me, and i didn\'t have enough practice with it?) is the ee-s easier to use? what do you guys prefer, any thoughts opinions? should i get both and see which ones works better for me?
edit:
not sure how much darker the ee-s screen is but i don\'t own any zooms and all my primes are faster then f2
i need to get a different focusing screen for my 5d to make manual focusing easier on my alternative lenses without AF, which screen should i get the ee-s precision matte or the split image focusing screen. ive used my friends film milnolta with the split screen and sometimes i felt like it would take too long to acquire something in focus(maybe its just me, and i didn\'t have enough practice with it?) is the ee-s easier to use? what do you guys prefer, any thoughts opinions? should i get both and see which ones works better for me?
Nov 17, 2009 at 02:12 AM
Previous versions of kahren's message #7785497 « ee-s or split screen for 5D »
