You make it sound like thinking that about D3x isn\'t something that should be allowed. Don\'t know why it\'s necessary to rehash that. I still think that Nikon overprice some stuff in absurd fashion...but that\'s for another thread.
I don\'t think I quite said that I prefer high ISO over MP?... if I did, I do not now... I think I realized that high ISO performance is not everything...and most of the time a high MP camera will come close to delivering a similar performance to something like a D700 at high ISO with more noise but also more detail. If you are shooting at high ISO, your image quality is going to be somewhat compromised no matter what even if you have a D700 or a 5d2...
I\'ve actually tried the 5d2 and 1ds3 before going to Sony now for $ reasons / Zeiss lenses / IS / Sony colours & low ISO quality. IS should be of great help when shooting a portrait with something like a 135 1.8, so I don\'t have to necessarily use high ISO...
You make it sound like thinking that about D3x isn\'t something that should be allowed. Don\'t know why it\'s necessary to rehash that/
I don\'t think I quite said that I prefer high ISO over MP?... if I did, I do not now... I think I realized that high ISO performance is not everything...and most of the time a high MP camera will come close to delivering a similar performance to something like a D700 at high ISO with more noise but also more detail. If you are shooting at high ISO, your image quality is going to be somewhat compromised no matter what even if you have a D700 or a 5d2...
I\'ve actually tried the 5d2 and 1ds3 before going to Sony now for $ reasons / Zeiss lenses / IS / Sony colours & low ISO quality. IS should be of great help when shooting a portrait with something like a 135 1.8, so I don\'t have to necessarily use high ISO...
You make it sound like thinking that about D3x isn\'t something that should be allowed. Don\'t know why it\'s necessary to rehash that/
I don\'t think I quite said that I prefer high ISO over MP?... if I did, I do not now... I think I realized that high ISO performance is not everything...and most of the time a high MP camera will come close to delivering a similar performance to something like a D700 at high ISO with more noise but also more detail. If you are shooting at high ISO, your image quality is going to be somewhat compromised no matter what...
I\'ve actually tried the 5d2 and 1ds3 before going to Sony now for $ reasons / Zeiss lenses / IS / Sony colours & low ISO quality. IS should be of great help when shooting a portrait with something like a 135 1.8, so I don\'t have to necessarily use high ISO...
You make it sound like thinking that about D3x isn\'t something that should be allowed. I don\'t think I quite said that I prefer high ISO over MP?... if I did, I do not now... I think I realized that high ISO performance is not everything...and most of the time a high MP camera will come close to delivering a similar performance to something like a D700 at high ISO with more noise but also more detail. If you are shooting at high ISO, your image quality is going to be somewhat compromised no matter what...
I\'ve actually tried the 5d2 and 1ds3 before going to Sony now for $ reasons / Zeiss lenses / IS / Sony colours & low ISO quality. IS should be of great help when shooting a portrait with something like a 135 1.8, so I don\'t have to necessarily use high ISO...
You make it sound like thinking that about D3x isn\'t something that should be allowed. I don\'t think I quite said that I prefer high ISO over MP?... if I did, I do not now... I think I realized that high ISO performance is not everything...and most of the time a high MP camera will come close to delivering a similar performance to something like a D700 at high ISO with more noise but also more detail. If you are shooting at high ISO, your image quality is going to be somewhat compromised no matter what...
I\'ve actually tried the 5d2 and 1ds3 before going to Sony now for $ reasons / Zeiss lenses / IS / Sony colours & low ISO quality.
Nov 16, 2009 at 05:27 PM
Previous versions of m_appeal's message #7783608 « Image Quality - A850 or D700 »
Don\'t know why it\'s necessary to rehash that. I still think that Nikon overprice some stuff in absurd fashion...but that\'s for another thread.