hvilorio wrote:
Both images where shot equally, one minute apart from each other, except that I had the 7D at 10mm(16mm) and the 5D2 at 17mm. I used on the 7D the 10-22 Canon lens and on the 5D2 I used the 16-35L v1 lens. The where captured in a 3 shot bracket, in AV at f/16. They where processed in Photomatix using the same parameters and they have the same develop setting in Lightroom on the resulting HDR Tonemapped image. I used no Noise Removal nor did I sharpen the images.
For the 7D HDR I used the JPG out of the camera, I also have the RAW files to redo the HDR when support for them is better available.
I didn\'t process the images all the way I would if I where going to print it, just the bare minimum. I didn\'t correct CA. The files where exported out of Lightroom with the long edge at 800 pixels to upload to flickr. The 100% crops where screen captures from Lightroom on my Mac. The originals have no crop in post processing.
If anyone wants to see the original JPG output I could find a way to upload them for anyone to see. I\'m no professional and my comparison could very well be flawed, if anyone has any suggestions I could retest.
well at f/16 and using different lenses, etc. you really can\'t make a comparison in terms of pure sensor quality
although i guess, since some people like \'real\' world stuff only, this is very real world since if you need f/16 you need f/16 and that will blur the 7D more than a FF and if the 10-22 is what you have, it is what you have
but in terms of whether the 7D really produces softer images in general you really can\'t determine anything from that test
Nov 15, 2009 at 03:59 PM
Previous versions of skibum5's message #7779130 « 7D not good for landscape? »
