fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
JackCnd
's message
#7774349
« 7D not good for landscape? »
JackCnd
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: 7D not good for landscape?
mfurman wrote
:
JackCnd:
If you more forward with the 5D II to match the 7D\'s FOV the 5D II comes out ahead,
Is it because of 21 vs 18 Mpixels resolution difference? Is EOS 7D a 18 Mpixel camera?
\"...as you are closer to the subject with more pixels on it.\"
All of the scenarios assume RAW shooting, DPP processing, with all NR and other gimmicks turned off in camera and in DPP.
The 5D II is a 21 MP FF camera with 8MP in the 1.6x crop area.
The 7D is a 18MP 1.6x crop camera
which has the equivalent pixel density of the 46MP FF camera.
I like apples better than oranges but not everyone agrees
Nov 14, 2009 at 08:04 AM
Previous versions of
JackCnd
's message
#7774349
« 7D not good for landscape? »