thedigitalbean wrote: abqnmusa wrote:
I see \"mazing\" in 5D original photos and 20D photos. ACR processed images. Even in Nikon images from web. Only visible well past 200% or greater.
I think it is all processing related.
You can add the 1Ds3, 1D3 and 5D2 to that list. I pulled up 7D and 1Ds3 images taken with the same glass of the same subject and in the same RAW processor and I see absolutely no difference in the \"mazing\" between these two bodies.
well you saw above where i posted one from my 50D and it was a heck of a lot smoother (and a 50D could give you birding reach at half the price, of course it is not quite as fast and the AF is not quite as good for one shot and hopefully not nearly as good for AI servo)
maybe I just got lucky with getting a \'rare\' good copy of two 20D\'s, a 40D, a 50D, a 5D2 and trying \'rare\' good copies of a couple 1D2ns, a 1D2, a 10D, a 20D and a 30D and got unlucky with two 7Ds.
thedigitalbean wrote: abqnmusa wrote:
I see \"mazing\" in 5D original photos and 20D photos. ACR processed images. Even in Nikon images from web. Only visible well past 200% or greater.
I think it is all processing related.
You can add the 1Ds3, 1D3 and 5D2 to that list. I pulled up 7D and 1Ds3 images taken with the same glass of the same subject and in the same RAW processor and I see absolutely no difference in the \"mazing\" between these two bodies.
well you saw above where i posed one from my 50D and it was a heck of a lot smoother
maybe I just got lucky with getting a \'rare\' good copy of two 20D\'s, a 40D, a 50D, a 5D2 and trying \'rare\' good copies of a couple 1D2ns, a 1D2, a 10D, a 20D and a 30D and got unlucky with two 7Ds.
Nov 12, 2009 at 10:18 PM
Previous versions of skibum5's message #7768981 « Canon EOS 7D Master thread »
