photomadnz wrote:
Fair enough about to disclosing to many results. I think you should re-read the test result pages against each other and then re-read the conclusion. Pretty clear to me.
I am a subscriber too and what you are saying here is not true at all. I think you should re-read the test result pages yourself.
You repeatedly made some statements about the supposed superior Canon 24 over the Zeiss 21/2.8, but up to now you didn\'t post any picture that confirms this statement. Besides that, how can we know that your focussing was done properly in these \"test\"? As you may know it is not difficult to make an unsharp-picture with a MF-lens. Are you sure you are able to manual focus accurate?
I don\'t understand why Photozone tests a ZF-lens with an adapter on a Canon. Why not test it on the D3x they have? Now it is possible that the use of the adapter results in a less reliable test.
Nov 12, 2009 at 04:29 PM
Previous versions of wiseguy010's message #7767639 « Zeiss ZE 21 mm Review on Photozone »
