hans98ko wrote: Alf Beharie wrote:
Thats colour noise due to underexposure I\'m afraid. I tried to ensure the exposures were the same but this was\'nt possible due to changing light conditions.
Very interesting topic with a title like \"Dispelling the Zeiss superiority myth?\" done in an \"control environment\" with changing light.
Base on your evaluation I should go back to school to re-educate myself regarding the effect of lighting on photography
Yes, apparently that might be a good idea because the lighting conditions have absolutely nothing to do with the results...All four crops are slightly underexposed but the FL crops are more underexposed than the Zeiss crops...In case you are not aware of it thats gives an advantage to the Zeiss, yet its still not as sharp as the FL.
Oct 28, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Previous versions of Alf Beharie's message #7701463 « Dispelling the Zeiss superiority myth? »
