So overall there is nothing wrong or bad with a valid critical review - and there is not really something bad about the 100 L macro lens either. Problem solved
Did you look at the title of this thread?
That\'s the problem: \"low\" score? Hardly!
Keith has an excellent point. Perhaps if the OP would revise the title the consternation would resolve itself.
To me it is LOW concidering new technology inside and L mark on lens. I didn\'t say fasco but I am sure lots of people will skip this lens. I did ...
Oct 18, 2009 at 10:10 AM
Previous versions of Breitling65's message #7655394 « 100L macro - low scores in photozone tests »
