fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of jorkata's message #7641224 « Image Quality: 7D vs 1D Mark III? »

  

jorkata
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Image Quality: 7D vs 1D Mark III?


alundeb wrote:

So you are saying 0.9 x 1.4 equals 1.0?


No.
The 7D is worse than the 40D at the pixel level but I have not measured exactly how much worse.

If the 7D has 1.4x more noise at the pixel level, there\'s zero noise advantage from downsizing.



Ever heard of 100% coverage microlenses?


Yes. What about them?

The 50D has them too - and the the pixel level, where microlenses are applied (you see, you don\'t apply a single microlens to a 50D image), the 50D is worse than the 40D.



Oct 14, 2009 at 05:31 PM





  Previous versions of jorkata's message #7641224 « Image Quality: 7D vs 1D Mark III? »