canonical wrote:
With PP you can do anything. If you want unvarnished comparisons with other bodies, go to imaging resource. This body is not all that spectacular at high ISO...marginally better than the 50D. That\'s not opinion, look for yourself. For the Canon fanboys, I\'m sure you will allege that IR is biased.
True. In many ways it is marginally better than the 50D at high ISO, but that\'s not the point of the camera. However, in terms of \"pattern noise,\" it\'s orders of magnitude better than the 50D. But you seemingly don\'t understand what pattern noise is. I don\'t believe that you\'ll ever \"get it.\"
If you follow the forums here and at ALL of the VIDEO forums around the world, this camera is rolling off the shelves as quickly as Canon can ship them. Can you tell us why SO many people are buying the 7D? What is your response to that?
I have to admit, I\'m going to laugh out loud here. When you show us similar examples shot with the Nikon D300S you\'ll have a leg to stand on. Until then, your less-than-educated opinions will be just that on these forums.
canonical wrote:
With PP you can do anything. If you want unvarnished comparisons with other bodies, go to imaging resource. This body is not all that spectacular at high ISO...marginally better than the 50D. That\'s not opinion, look for yourself. For the Canon fanboys, I\'m sure you will allege that IR is biased.
True. In many ways it is marginally better than the 50D at high ISO, but that\'s not the point of the camera. However, in terms of \"pattern noise,\" it\'s orders of magnitude better than the 50D. But you seemingly don\'t understand what pattern noise is. I don\'t believe that you\'ll ever \"get it.\"
If you follow the forums here and at ALL of the video forums around the world, this camera is rolling off the shelves as quickly as Canon can ship them. Can you tell us why SO many people are buying the 7D? What is your response to that?
I have to admit, I\'m going to laugh out loud here. When you show us similar examples shot with the Nikon D300S you\'ll have a leg to stand on. Until then, your less-than-educated opinions will be just that on these forums.
canonical wrote:
With PP you can do anything. If you want unvarnished comparisons with other bodies, go to imaging resource. This body is not all that spectacular at high ISO...marginally better than the 50D. That\'s not opinion, look for yourself. For the Canon fanboys, I\'m sure you will allege that IR is biased.
True. In many ways it is marginally better than the 50D at high ISO, but that\'s not the point of the camera. However, in terms of \"pattern noise,\" it\'s orders of magnitude better than the 50D. But you seemingly don\'t understand what pattern noise is. I don\'t believe that you\'ll ever \"get it.\"
If you follow the forums here and at ALL of the video forums around the world, this camera is rolling off the shelves as quickly as Canon can ship them. Can you tell us why SO many people are buying the 7D? What is your response to that?
I have to admit, I\'m going to laugh out loud here. When you show us similar examples shot with the Nikon D300S you\'ll have a leg to stand on. Until then, your less-than-educated opinions will be just that on these forums.
canonical wrote:
With PP you can do anything. If you want unvarnished comparisons with other bodies, go to imaging resource. This body is not all that spectacular at high ISO...marginally better than the 50D. That\'s not opinion, look for yourself. For the Canon fanboys, I\'m sure you will allege that IR is biased.
True. In many ways it is marginally better than the 50D at high ISO, but that\'s not the point of the camera. However, in terms of \"pattern noise,\" it\'s orders of magnitude better than the 50D. But you seemingly don\'t understand what pattern noise is. I don\'t believe that you\'ll ever \"get it.\"
If you follow the forums here and at ALL of the video forums around the world, this camera is rolling off the shelves as quickly as Canon can ship them. Can you tell us why SO many people are buying the 7D? What is your response to that?
I have to admit, I\'m going to laugh out loud here. When you show us similar examples shot with the Nikon D300S you\'ll have a leg to stand on. Until then, your less-than-educated opinions will be just that on these forums.
canonical wrote:
With PP you can do anything. If you want unvarnished comparisons with other bodies, go to imaging resource. This body is not all that spectacular at high ISO...marginally better than the 50D. That\'s not opinion, look for yourself. For the Canon fanboys, I\'m sure you will allege that IR is biased.
True. In many ways it is marginally better than the 50D at high ISO, but that\'s not the point of the camera. However, in terms of \"pattern noise,\" it\'s orders of magnitude better than the 50D. But you seemingly don\'t understand what pattern noise is. I don\'t believe that you\'ll ever \"get it.\"
If you follow the forums here and at ALL of the video forums around the world, this camera is rolling off the shelves as quickly as Canon can ship them. Can you tell us why SO many people are buying? What is your response to that?
I have to admit, I\'m going to laugh out loud here. When you show us similar examples shot with the Nikon D300S you\'ll have a leg to stand on. Until then, your less-than-educated opinions will be just that on these forums.
Carry on.
Oct 01, 2009 at 07:32 AM
Previous versions of cameron12x's message #7589995 « 7D High ISO Samples »
