mttran wrote: PetKal wrote:
Nick-San, the last two images in particular appeal to my sense of \"nice photography\".
BTW, is that Mark Rich strumming the guitar ? Boy, has he ever aged.
Peter, +1 for me. The \"IS\" does it well in these shots while the \"NON-IS\" might need mono/tripod pod to get the same images (with some luck). I am still thinking about f1.8
Michael, I can push 200 f/1.8 down to 1/250 sec if my arms are not tired. If I am able too lean against a tree or a building, or prop the lens on a fence, handrail, whatever, then 1/250 sec is not a problem for me. However, I wouldn\'t wanna shoot scenes like those at low shutter speeds anyway because of the subject motion blur concerns.
Sep 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM
Previous versions of PetKal's message #7552831 « Post your Canon 200mm f/2 (200/2) shots! »
