Tariq Gibran wrote:
Perhaps its because the samples are from a pre-production camera but I\'m not impressed at all. They appear veiled and lack a certain presence that, even with all its faults, M8 images seemed to have. Also, if you really look at the corners, particularly in shadow areas, the noise at even ISO 160 is terrible. Perhaps this is due to extreme vignetting compensation control such that the corners on a FF rangefinder must have a few stops of exposure compensation?
I agree based on the DPReview samples, but DPR is notorious for terrible looking sample photos. The clarity of the M9 samples is very poor, although the noise doesn\'t bother me too much. Not a single one of those photos is what I would consider \'sharp\'.