On a slightly different but related note, I used DXOMark to compare Canon 40D to theNikon D200.
Canon 40D:
Color Depth = 22.1
Dynamic Range = 11.3
Low Light ISO = 703
Nikon D200:
Color Depth = 22.3
Dynamic Range = 11.5
Low Light ISO = 583
Everyone knows the D200 is a noisy bugger at high ISO and its low light ISO score supports this.
YET, DXOMark assigns an overall score of 64.2 to D200 and \'only\' 63.5 to 40D. Is there a reasonable explanation of this or is this pure BIASNESS? If there is no satisfactory explanation for this, I will classify DXOMark as another extremely biased site, not unlike DPReview and Rob Galbraith.
Seems like all the major review sites are up in arms against Canon. Why?
On a slightly different but related note, I used DXOMark to compare Canon 40D and Nikon D200.
Canon 40D:
Color Depth = 22.1
Dynamic Range = 11.3
Low Light ISO = 703
Nikon D200:
Color Depth = 22.3
Dynamic Range = 11.5
Low Light ISO = 583
Everyone knows the D200 is a noisy bugger at high ISO and its low light ISO score supports this.
YET, DXOMark assigns an overall score of 64.2 to D200 and \'only\' 63.5 to 40D. Is there a reasonable explanation of this or is this pure BIASNESS? If there is no satisfactory explanation for this, I will classify DXOMark as another extremely biased site, not unlike DPReview and Rob Galbraith.
Seems like all the major review sites are up in arms against Canon. Why?
Sep 08, 2009 at 06:40 AM
Previous versions of thw2's message #7505457 « Canon EOS 7D Master thread »
