Never mind the bokeh. It is the action \"captureable\" with a lens that counts.
And there, 200 f/2 and 135 f/2 are amongst the best that Canon has.
I can\'t tell about yous, but if I was not lens-demented, I could have never justified the 200 f/2 IS over the likes of 135L and 200 f/2.8.
Mind you, there are some very good reasons for 200 f/2 IS being much more expensive......however, that much more ?
Aug 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Previous versions of PetKal's message #7452840 « 135L vs 200 f/2 IS bokeh »
It is the action \"captureable\" with a lens that counts. 