Will Patterson wrote: mttran wrote: mh2000 wrote:
anyone who thinks the II is more noisy willing to post an example from both normalized for area?
stanj wrote: mttran wrote: orangefirefish wrote:
I like the 5D files better as well when I used both side by side. Other than in resolution and high ISO performance, the 5D just has a more balanced looking file, with amazing sharpness and also very realistic and convincing colors.
+1, I feel the same way on 5D1 files - it is much cleaner files at low iso.
Per pixel or per square area?
No longer have 5D so side by side shooting can\'t be archieved. Well, if i have time, we can compare 1ds2 vs 5d2 at low iso. Any way, this is the shadow noise issue i am talking about. Just taking any 5D/5D2 low ISO headshot and zoom in person\'s hair to see the differences.
My old 5D does the same thing when you crank up the exposure. The 1DS does it as well.
All canon bodies have shadow noise at low iso, but not as bad as 5d2. Here is some (not side-by-side shooting) samples from 5D & 1Ds2. They do look cleaner than 5D2 previous samples.
let\'s me know you still want 5D2 & 1Ds2 low iso side-by-side shooting. Well, it won\'t make any difference from the ones that you have already seen. The image speaks for itself. I don\'t think we need to debate anymore on this. I went through the old 5d/1ds2 files and their shadow noise look much better than 5D2.
Aug 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Previous versions of mttran's message #7408195 « To owners of both 5D and 5D2 »
