I believe it is the general consensus here in FM that the DXOMark ratings are not all that accurate, or that at least some of their ratings do not translate well to real life shooting.
Several examples of this have been posted here several times before.
But for argument\'s sake, let\'s admit they are accurate.
And let\'s admit that, like you said, Nikon\'s sensor technology is more advanced than canon\'s.
So they are able to stick more pixels on a smaller sensor and still get better IQ than canon.
Great.
But I don\'t shoot nikon.
I shoot canon.
So given the same tecnhology (canon) and all other variables, putting more pixels on a sensor without making it larger will have a tendency to make the final images more noisy.
You are comparing canon to nikon.
I was comparing canon to canon.
I might be wrong, of course...
Aug 11, 2009 at 11:28 AM
Previous versions of fraga's message #7404156 « September Annoucement for 1D Mark IV »
