Sigma 50mm Review: Yes its better than Canon 50mm f1.4
EB-1 wrote:
It\'s a rather weak, non-critical review, without supporting data.
Why thank you, so brief and to the point. Quick question, provided you are completely right about the technical part, you never found the review fluid in its presentation of information?
EB-1 wrote:
How can you compare two lenses without having the Canon 50/1.4 to test against? How are you testing it and how can you claim that it is best at f/2.8-4?
I wasn\'t referring to the canon in that statement. I made that statement about the Sigma.
EB-1 wrote:
AF accuracy and precision (repeatability), and lens-to lens quality variation would be my major concerns with any Sigma lens.
EBH
That\'s precisely what made me so reluctant in ordering this lens, nonetheless I took the risk and was presently surprised.
Jul 04, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Previous versions of abdul10000's message #7265923 « Sigma 50mm Review: Yes its better than Canon 50mm f1.4 »
