fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Cableaddict's message #7227036 « Einstein Design Solution/Suggestion »

  

Cableaddict
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Einstein Design Solution/Suggestion


mmurph wrote:
This Comet 400 watt battery operated system looks interesting. I was not familiar with it before:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/333403-REG/Comet_LB_411_KT_LB_400_System_Kit.html


Interesting. At least this is a single-outlet pack, which keeps the cost down. However, there\'s no modeling light at all, and while the head can do 1200 w/s, the pack only allows 400 w/s. Obviously, that keeps the cost down, but they might have been wise to bump it to 600 w/s at a slightly higher price. It also has a non-replacable flash tube. That\'s a big mistake IMO.

The other big questions with this unit are what modifiers can be used, and what radio remote system is available. (I\'m really sold on the Skyport / cyber-commander type of dingus.)
---------

The above caveats aside, this looks better than a comparably-priced Q-flash system. But for $300 more you can have the low-end Ranger RX system, which does 1100 w/s,has a 200 watt modelling light, and has a replacable tube. Plus, it takes Elinchrom modifiers & has Elinchroms proven track record behind it. (color consistency, etc)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=392226&is=REG&addedTroughType=search#specifications

Of course, the RX has it\'s own limitation, being 1100 w/s with only a -step range. There won\'t be much fine-tuning at low power. Can you swap-in a lower-power head with the RX pack?

Why can\'t digital systems have more output variability? What is the limitation on that? Who wouldn\'t want an 1100 w/s head if it could run at 50 w/s and be bumped 10 w/s per click? Obviously this can\'t be done, but why not?



Jun 24, 2009 at 12:22 AM
Cableaddict
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Einstein Design Solution/Suggestion


mmurph wrote:
This Comet 400 watt battery operated system looks interesting. I was not familiar with it before:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/333403-REG/Comet_LB_411_KT_LB_400_System_Kit.html


Interesting. At least this is a single-outlet pack, which keeps the cost down. However, there\'s no modeling light at all, and while the head can do 1200 w/s, the pack only allows 400 w/s. Obviously, that keeps the cost down, but they might have been wise to bump it to 600 w/s at a slightly higher price. It also has a non-replacable flash tube. That\'s a big mistake IMO.

The other big questions with this unit are what modifiers can be used, and what radio remote system is available. (I\'m really sold on the Skyport / cyber-commander type of dingus.)
---------

The above caveats aside, this looks better than a comparably-priced Q-flash system. But for $300 more you can have the low-end Ranger RX system, which does 1100 w/s,has a 200 watt modelling light, and has a replacable tube. Plus, it takes Elinchrom modifiers & has Elinchroms proven track record behind it. (color consistency, etc)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=392226&is=REG&addedTroughType=search#specifications

Of course, the RX has it\'s own limitation, being 1100 w/s with only a -step range. There won\'t be much fine-tuning at low power. Can you swap-in a lower-power head with the RX pack?

Why can\'t digital systems have more output variability? What is the limitation on that? Who wouldn\'t want an 1100 w/s head if it could run at 50 w/s and be bumps 10 w/s per click? Obviously this can\'t be done, but why not?



Jun 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM





  Previous versions of Cableaddict's message #7227036 « Einstein Design Solution/Suggestion »