Colin Key wrote:
Am I the only person to think it rather odd and biased that RG\'s conclusions are based, as far as I can see, solely on rather tedious shots of athletes (in the broadest sense of the term)?
Nope, you\'re not alone Colin.
I had a laugh a couple of days ago when I read a post on another website from someone who reckoned they could replicate RG\'s Mk III results on his Mk IIn by shooting similarly featureless, low contrast subjects as those RG is shooting in his Mk III tests...
May 31, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Previous versions of keithreeder's message #7136535 « Galbraith Update: MK III Not Improved »
