fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Scott Stoness's message #6908692 « HDR vs NDGrad vs Manual Blend »

  

Scott Stoness
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
HDR vs NDGrad vs Manual Blend


Since I started the thread, i will summarize to be helpful.

Personally I like Floris\'s version the best but it is marginally better than the 2nd image I posted which is a blend of HDR/single image 20/80. But Alichty is very close. Which is not to say the others are not good but it was 7AMish and they do look the closest to what I remember.

More importantly than this observation, I note that: 9/20 would go with manual blend. 4/20 went with adjustment to just one image. 2/20 went with Photomatix. 5/20 went with a blend of HDR/single image.

Which takes me back to my assertion at the beggining. Photomatix (with the settings turned down to modest) blended with a single image and with color adjustments is pretty dam good. A manual blend can do as well or better in skilled hands. So if you are interested in 90% results with 10% effort a workflow that does hdr, fixes colors and blends with single image is efficient to my mind.

Leaving me with the comment - thanks all for participating. It was very helpful to me and makes me want to learn manual blending when I get the time.

For reference:
http://photographybyvarina.blogspot.com/2009/03/ihdr-part-1-workflow-overview.html is phantom knights link to intelligent blending
http://www.nwpphotoforum.com/ubbthreads/information/php/2007_Articles/rjohnston/roman2.php is a link to Roman johnston manual blending tutorial
http://www.flickr.com/photos/realkuhl/412994075/ is a link to realkulh\'s tutorial
http://www.goodlight.us/writing/tutorials.html is a link to Tony Kuyper\'s blending tutorial

Again, thanks for the input. Scott






Apr 01, 2009 at 10:25 PM





  Previous versions of Scott Stoness's message #6908692 « HDR vs NDGrad vs Manual Blend »