fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of erichard's message #6804995 « 5D2 low ISO poor v 1Ds3 »

  

erichard
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 5D2 low ISO poor v 1Ds3


I had the same results. It\'s not so much the noise, but the regular pattern to it, the vertical banding as if you are shooting through fine linen.

I think it might be the highlight tone priority, but I haven\'t done a controlled shoot to determine. I wrote to Canon about it. They said to send it in, but I\'m not doing it till I replicate the circumstances better.

ISO 200 may be a common ISO, as that\'s the lowest Highlight tone priority will go.

My guess that\'s a firmware upgrade away from getting fixed, even though that was supposed to be the case with firmware 1.07.

My problem looked exactly like that upper corner.

Part of the reason I like the 5DII is highlight protection, but maybe I\'ll have to do without a bit.

It can be spotted in the lower left of this photo, the vertical banding:











&type=medium&ver=12363993970001



Mar 06, 2009 at 11:17 PM
erichard
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: 5D2 low ISO poor v 1Ds3


I had the same results. It\'s not so much the noise, but the regular pattern to it, the vertical banding as if you are shooting through fine linen.

I think it might be the highlight tone priority, but I haven\'t done a controlled shoot to determine. I wrote to Canon about it. They said to send it in, but I\'m not doing it till I replicate the circumstances better.

ISO 200 may be a common ISO, as that\'s the lowest Highlight tone priority will go.

My guess that\'s a firmware upgrade away from getting fixed, even though that was supposed to be the case with firmware 1.07.

My problem looked exactly like that upper corner.

Part of the reason I like the 5DII is highlight protection, but maybe I\'ll have to do without a bit.

It can be spotted in the lower left of this photo, the vertical banding:









Mar 06, 2009 at 11:05 PM





  Previous versions of erichard's message #6804995 « 5D2 low ISO poor v 1Ds3 »