fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
mmurph
's message
#6693113
« 5DII failures on LL Antarctic trip »
mmurph
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
On
Re: 5DII failures on LL Antarctic trip
brainiac wrote
:
BTW, the odds are quite interesting if you plan to take 5D2\'s to the antarctic. The important question is how many 5D\'s do you need to take to get a certain likelihood of at least one camera continuing to work. It goes like this:
2 cameras: 93.75%
3 cameras: 98.4%
4 cameras: 99.6%
5 cameras: 99.9%
No, that is backward.
The odds of all your cameras failing are:
2 cameras: 1/4 x 1/4 = 1/16
3 cameras: 1/4 x 1/4 x14 = 1/64
4 cameras: 1/4 x 1/4 x14 x 1/4 = 1/256
etc.
You pick the level of \"confidence\" that is acceptable - 90%, etc. - and plan accordingly.
But, 1/2 the failures were intermittent. Which means the camera started working again, so only a shorter down time.
Feb 07, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Previous versions of
mmurph
's message
#6693113
« 5DII failures on LL Antarctic trip »