Maybe...just maybe, it\'s about photographers who know what they\'re doing being a bit surprised that the new offerings from Canon don\'t live up to their expectations (at least that\'s my case after playing with Canon\'s new flagship). Noise like I\'ve seen (and in examples here) increases the amount of post production I have to do to get a clean image out. Or it dictates that I\'m not able to give my images their look because the image can\'t handle the heat. Of course I have to choose more post production time. When I\'m already dealing with a large amount of images, that\'s not a friendly encounter. There\'s obviously a wide range of acceptable image quality amongst members on any forum, but my expectations are a bit let down. Hopefully time will tell how this turns out.
anthonygh wrote:
Does anyone on this forum ever engage in photography rather than magnifying bits of images then engaging in numerous debates about those bits?
Anyone who can\'t produce superb images with either of these cameras....just isn\'t any good. What is the universal saying about a poor workman blaming his tools?
Feb 03, 2009 at 06:49 PM
Previous versions of cineski's message #6677535 « 5D2 low ISO poor v 1Ds3 »
