pipspeak wrote:
I always cringe when these discussions descend into subjective analyses of what makes a good photo. We all see something different. Personally I\'m in the camp of \"it\'s the impact of the image that counts, not the technical quality of the shot\". That, IMO is how photos should be judged. I couldn\'t care less if something is not pixel-perfect, as long as the image jumps out and grabs me.
Well yes that\'s a major judging criterion, but IMO neither this or last years winner have done either. They do jump out at me on any level and make me say wow and they are not technically superb. But that\'s just me.
Jan 06, 2009 at 09:00 PM
Previous versions of Pixel Perfect's message #6565973 « Wildlife Photographer of the Year »
