n0b0 wrote:
If the subject happens to be very rare and the lighting/composition happens to be great, would you still acknowledge them as photographer of the year?
Just my 2 cents..
Why not? That\'s how some \'ordinary\' photographers turn into overnight stars because they win some competitions with \'fluke\' shots.
I will like to hear from those who bashed the 2008 entry to do likewise to the winning entry in 2007. Mind you, there is a chance someone may accuse you of sour grapes. So, there, you are warned.
n0b0 wrote:
If the subject happens to be very rare and the lighting/composition happens to be great, would you still acknowledge them as photographer of the year?
Just my 2 cents..
Why not? That\'s how some \'ordinary\' photographers turn into overnight stars because they win some competitions with \'fluke\' shots.
I will like to hear from those who bashed the 2008 entry to do likewise to the winning entry in 2007. Mind you, there is a chance someone may accuse you of sour grapes. So, there, you are warned.
Jan 06, 2009 at 10:50 AM
Previous versions of thw2's message #6563489 « Wildlife Photographer of the Year »
