mathew333 wrote: Neil vN wrote:
Mathew .. more than 2 years of writing, in more than 150 postings, with reams of helpful advice on that website ... and you\'ll zone in and find one thing to criticize and be snide about. And that is the sole motivation for your post now, with no bearing on the original question here. Sweet. Nice going on your first day here.
Neil vN
www.planetneil.com/tangents/
Nice you got another link in. The only reason you are on multiple sites is to pimp your book and your seminar. Its just a fact and was proven when you left a link that had nothing to do with the thread.
Mathew, it\'s just a signature which comes after his name. Lots of people do it, I really wouldn\'t worry.
Now getting back on topic, as other people have said, if a user can view your image then it has to have been downloaded to their computer, urgo they can save it. So it really depends on what your intent is as to the best method to prevent people using it.
Disabling right click and using CSS background hacks will do a great job of stopping Aunt Etthel downloading pictures of a wedding and printing them for free. It won\'t however stop a determined crook, for that a big watermark is best however that often can impinge upon your photos.
I prefer to leave mine on the whole unguarded. I might change that at some point but at the moment I\'ll use the law if I have any major problems.
Alex
Jan 06, 2009 at 07:35 AM
Previous versions of ai3x's message #6562994 « Blog images being stolen? »
