bobbytan wrote:
Let\'s not jump the gun. Nikon is not so stupid as to put out an $8,000 body that is not better than their $5,000 D3. I am sure it will be better than the D3. The question is, how much better .... and will it be significantly better than the 1Ds Mk III? My guess is it will be very good. And the target market that Nikon has identified (commercial, advertising, fashion, and all those who require MF quality) are very real indeed i.e. these pros DO want a DSLR that can delivery digital MF quality.
I seem to remember a larger company making a bad marketing decision not too long ago. Maybe the pressure is on. I don\'t know whether either company can see the green for the trees or they are just choosing the wrong clubs. The 5D mkII should at least bring Canon within putting distance. Just how close to the hole we shall have to see.
Dec 01, 2008 at 03:44 PM
Previous versions of Tony B's message #6438531 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
