Justin D wrote:
I was thinking about this the other day - it seems like a glaring hole in the lens lineup. Something which would turn the 450D into teh high quality small format camera so many looking for. Would be a tessar @ around 40mm equivalent and f2.0 or so with the quality in build and optics (and price) of the 35 2.0 or the 50 1.8. Nothing special, just a solid prime to make the 450D into a good P+S.
So why not?
I wouldn\'t call it a glaring hole. A pancake is a speciality lens and only a tiny minority of EOS shooters would buy it. Besides, I use the EF 35 2.0 and it\'s pretty damn tiny. It\'s so small every time I reach for the frickin\' MF ring I grab air. I keep it mounted on a gripless (no BG-E2) 40D and it feels like a deluxe point \'n shoot. With the EW-65 II mounted it looks like its wearing a miniskirt.
I happen to have a Nikkor 45 2.8P I bought as part of a kit with a Nikon FM3A in 2002. Cute little lens: sharp but so tiny as to be awkward to focus and set apertures. I rarely use it and greatly prefer my Nikkor 50 1.4 AIS. It\'s only a little larger but much easier to operate and much faster.
Nov 24, 2008 at 03:30 AM
Previous versions of Gochugogi's message #6413452 « Why no EF-S pancake lens ~25-28mm? »
