The 5D\'s AF was NEVER crappy .... so how can the 5D II\'s AF be described as crappy? It is a tried-and-proven system .... and in some ways, it is more reliable than the 1D Mk III.
Talk about factual, hard evidence, how can Canon\'s most successful and biggest selling DSLR have a crappy AF system? Who in their right minds would buy the 5D if it had crappy AF, and were there threads about the 5D\'s crappy AF system .... like there were dozens of threads about the 1D3\'s AF
simonella_viru wrote:
i\'ve seen the speculating go both ways. some say that the 5d II will have crappy AF. some say that the 5d II will have vastly superior IQ. some have even said that the 5d II will cure cancer. at the end of the day, it\'s all just a supposition based on some sample images and specs.
factual, hard evidence and proof was always sparse on this forum. the canon forum should be labeled with a disclaimer that says, \"for entertainment purposes only\". it really is, just for fun as we banter back and forth.
The 5D\'s AF was NEVER crappy (the 5D was and still is, without a doubt, Canon\'s most successful DSLR) .... so how can the 5D II\'s AF be described as crappy? It is a tried-and-proven system .... and in some ways, it is more reliable than the 1D Mk III.
simonella_viru wrote:
i\'ve seen the speculating go both ways. some say that the 5d II will have crappy AF. some say that the 5d II will have vastly superior IQ. some have even said that the 5d II will cure cancer. at the end of the day, it\'s all just a supposition based on some sample images and specs.
factual, hard evidence and proof was always sparse on this forum. the canon forum should be labeled with a disclaimer that says, \"for entertainment purposes only\". it really is, just for fun as we banter back and forth.
The 5D\'s AF was NEVER crappy (it was and is, without a doubt, Canon\'s most successful DSLR) .... so how can the 5D II\'s AF be described as crappy? It is a tried-and-proven system .... and in some ways, it is more reliable than the 1D Mk III.
simonella_viru wrote:
i\'ve seen the speculating go both ways. some say that the 5d II will have crappy AF. some say that the 5d II will have vastly superior IQ. some have even said that the 5d II will cure cancer. at the end of the day, it\'s all just a supposition based on some sample images and specs.
factual, hard evidence and proof was always sparse on this forum. the canon forum should be labeled with a disclaimer that says, \"for entertainment purposes only\". it really is, just for fun as we banter back and forth.
The 5D\'s AF was NEVER crappy .... so how can the 5D II\'s AF be described as crappy? It is a tried-and-proven system .... and in some ways, it is more reliable than the 1D Mk III.
simonella_viru wrote:
i\'ve seen the speculating go both ways. some say that the 5d II will have crappy AF. some say that the 5d II will have vastly superior IQ. some have even said that the 5d II will cure cancer. at the end of the day, it\'s all just a supposition based on some sample images and specs.
factual, hard evidence and proof was always sparse on this forum. the canon forum should be labeled with a disclaimer that says, \"for entertainment purposes only\". it really is, just for fun as we banter back and forth.
Oct 07, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Previous versions of bobbytan's message #6248754 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
