fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Tim Speciale's message #6246592 « Wow, i just wrote this and had to share it »

  

Tim Speciale
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Wow, i just wrote this and had to share it


I\'m a member of some cycling forums and a person is asking about what camera to buy. The following post ensued...

Very lucky to get a D40 without lens for $600?

Here\'s one brand new, with lens, tripods, carrying case, UV filter, and 2 gb card for $478 shipped.


Here\'s one with 3 lenses. Same seller. Hard case and soft case. Only $574 shipped.


*So i chime in*

He was talking about a 40D, not a D40





You should know that Nikon is the one who puts the D first, not canon

Unless of course you\'re talking about the D30


Or the 60D



Don\'t be confused though, that is much older than the 50D
?v=0">

But when they made the 10Dthey moved the D to the back, which is newer than the D30 but not newer than the 30D



So somehow we moved the numbers around to come up with a newer camera that both looks older and newer than the 30D and 60D yet is quite a bit older than the 50D which in fact is newer than the 30D but not younger than the 60D and in fact is a bit different than the D30



And please, don\'t confuse any of this with the 450D, which is a different camera entirely


It\'s confusing, i know but it probably proves a point...if you\'re paying attention. The bottom line is that all of these are great cameras, and if you can\'t take a good photograph with any of these then you are wasting your money and should probably buy a 35f...err, 35mm film camera

My vote would be for an ae-1, cheap and plenty of accessories.



Oct 06, 2008 at 08:41 PM
Tim Speciale
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Wow, i just wrote this and had to share it


I\'m a member of some cycling forums and a person is asking about what camera to buy. The following post ensued...

Very lucky to get a D40 without lens for $600?

Here\'s one brand new, with lens, tripods, carrying case, UV filter, and 2 gb card for $478 shipped.


Here\'s one with 3 lenses. Same seller. Hard case and soft case. Only $574 shipped.


*So i chime in*

He was talking about a 40D, not a D40





You should know that Nikon is the one who puts the D first, not canon

Unless of course you\'re talking about the D30


But when they made the 60D they moved the D to the back


Don\'t be confused though, that is much older than the 50D


It\'s also older than the 10D, which is newer than the D30 but not newer than the 30D


So somehow we moved the numbers around to come up with a newer camera that both looks older and newer than the 30D and 60D yet is quite a bit older than the 50D which in fact is newer than the 30D but not younger than the 60D and in fact is a bit different than the D30



And please, don\'t confuse any of this with the 450D, which is a different camera entirely


It\'s confusing, i know but it probably proves a point...if you\'re paying attention. The bottom line is that all of these are great cameras, and if you can\'t take a good photograph with any of these then you are wasting your money and should probably buy a 35f...err, 35mm film camera

My vote would be for an ae-1, cheap and plenty of accessories.



Oct 06, 2008 at 08:19 PM





  Previous versions of Tim Speciale's message #6246592 « Wow, i just wrote this and had to share it »