globalkiwi wrote:
As I stated at the beginning of my post, my point wasn\'t about you specifically but the cycles of rumor, dissatisfaction & argument that precede & follow each announcement. Nonetheless, you\'ve posted here over 100 times which surely gives me the right to treat your posts like anyone else\'s & hold you accountable for what you write. Indeed you, like so many others here, want to claim credit for being \"right\" about the 5DII yet seem to now be invoking \"visitor\" status when it comes to your speculation about the 1D4(?!).
I have on occasion posted here, but not to the degree that you insinuated, cetainly not on this thread. I may have racked up 100 posts, but then again, I\'ve had a FM account for a long time. So 100 posts is actually quite a low number.
you seem to be quite a suspious and cynical soul. It seems to me that you\'ve taken it on yourself to make a point by naming me specifically but covering yourself by saying that you weren\'t. Yes you can hold my posts acountable if you really want to...but who made you my moderator? What gives you the right? What are you going to do if you don\'t like what I write? I stated my opinion as I saw it....and mostly I have been quite correct. This is a public forum, moderated for bad language and abuse. It\'s free speach and from your tone...you seem to be unhappy with my previous posts.
I am not looking for appreciation and I have never asked for \"credit\" as you put it.
This is all a game and it\'s not serious, but some take all this far too seriously.
This new 5DII will be my 6th DSLR that I\'ve bought. But I could still use my original camera and make a profit. That\'s life and business for you.
like I said, this is a public forum for photographers to voice their opinion and free speach. If you think it should be more...then take that up with the owner of the forum.
Sep 25, 2008 at 09:29 AM
Previous versions of gazzajagman's message #6206943 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
