why do people keep saying the 50d is virtualy the same as the 40d? without using one 1st hand this is really inane...its obvious the 50d is different in many ways..one of which is IQ,not just the more MPs..you have to include the new sensor and the digic4 chip..in the equation it adds up to more than\" its basically the same as a 40d...rubbish\"
1 wedding photogs I would assume like this body
2.Photojournalists small mags and papers would appreciate the feature set of this body
pair it with a 17-40 (basically 26-64mm FF) nearly as useful as a 24-70 f2.8 since you
can bump the ISO up a bit to make up for the diff of f2.8 and f4
3 I can see a limited sports use with this camera (see #2)
4 more affordable option for (#1 and #2 people) than a 1 series
5 the hobbiest that want a lil more than what a 30d or 40d can do of which allow you to use
cheaper f4 \"L\" options and be able to exploit the IQ of this camera..
why do people keep saying the 50d is virtualy the same as the 40d? without using one 1st hand this is really inane...its obvious the 50d is different in many ways..one of which is IQ,not just the more MPs..you have to include the new sensor and the digic4 chip..in the equation it adds up to more than\" its basically the same as a 40d...rubbish\"
1 wedding photogs I would assume like this body
2.Photojournalists small mags and papers would appreciate the feature set of this body
pair it with a 17-40 (basically 26-64mm FF) nearly as useful as a 24-70 f2.8 since you
can bump the ISO up a bit to make up for the diff of f2.8 and f4
3 I can see a limited sports use with this camera (see #2)
4 more affordable option for (#1 and #2 people) than a 1 series
5 the hobbiest that want a lil more than what a 30d or 40d can do of which allow you to use
cheaper f4 \"L\" options and be able to exploit the IQ of this camera..
why do people keep saying the 50d is virtualy the same as the 40d? without using one 1st hand this is really inane...its obvious the 50d is different in many ways..one of which is IQ,not just the more MPs..you have to include the new sensor and the digic4 chip..in the equation it adds up to more than\" its basically the same as a 40d...rubbish\"
1 wedding photogs I would assume like this body
2.Photojournalists small mags and papers would appreciate the feature set of this body
pair it with a 17-40 (basically 26-64mm FF) nearly as useful as a 24-70 f2.8 since you
can bump the ISO up a bit to make up for the diff of f2.8 and f4
3 I can see a limited sports use with this camera (see #2)
4 more affordable option for (#1 and #2 people) than a 1 series
5 the hobbiest that want a lil more than what a 30d or 40d can do of which allow you to use
cheaper f4 \"L\" options and be able to exploit the IQ of this camera..
why do people keep saying the 50d is virtualy the same as the 40d? without using one 1st hand this is really inane...its obvious the 50d is different in many ways..one of which is IQ,not just the more MPs..you have to include the new sensor and the digic4 chip..in the equation it adds up to more than\" its basically the same as a 40d...rubbish\"
Sep 17, 2008 at 07:14 PM
Previous versions of digitalbug30d's message #6179878 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
