I thought that sRAW was practically useless on a 10MP camera, but on a 20+ MP camera it starts to make sense, especially if binning those pixels are actually used to make a higher-quality file. Considering that many of us photographers are after increased DR and higher per-pixel quality in general, it starts to become idiosyncratic that Canon is increasing megapixels at a rapid rate in order to create fewer, higher-quality pixels. es, I know that line of thinking is a bit of a stretch, but I\'d prefer they go at it from the other end of the spectrum.
Kind of the wrong approach in my opinion, but we all know what that\'s worth.
-Jeff
I\'m inclined to agree but I do like the fact that with all the pixels it gives theoption of having larger file sizes too. That\'s kinda neat for landscape shooters. More options=good stuff.
I thought that sRAW was practically useless on a 10MP camera, but on a 20+ MP camera it starts to make sense, especially if binning those pixels are actually used to make a higher-quality file. Considering that many of us photographers are after increased DR and higher per-pixel quality in general, it starts to become idiosyncratic that Canon is increasing megapixels at a rapid rate in order to create fewer, higher-quality pixels. es, I know that line of thinking is a bit of a stretch, but I\'d prefer they go at it from the other end of the spectrum.
Kind of the wrong approach in my opinion, but we all know what that\'s worth.
-Jeff
I\'m inclined to agree but I do like the fact that with all the pixels it gives theoption of having larger file sizes too. That\'s kinda neat for landscape shooters. More options=good stuff.
Sep 17, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Previous versions of BennyR's message #6177968 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
