eosfun wrote: hey are probably pleased because their D300\'s and D700\'s still have much better focussing systems. And built-in flashes. And more than 2 stops of exposure compensation. And remote flash triggering. And a whole lot of other stuff that makes them very viable competition to Canon\'s as yet unreleased nonesuch.
It\'s features or image quality. Bells and whistles or megapixels. Guess what makes EOSfun? Megapixels. There is no substitute for megapixels.
Pixels EOSfun, pixels. There is no substitute for pixels. Megapixels means million pixels. That\'s becoming a commonly misused term. Sensors have pixels on them, not megapixels. They aren\'t interchangeable terms. Sorry, just a little pet peave. And I do agree with you.
And to those complaining about too many pixels, YOU CAN SHOOT AT LESS THAN FULL RESOLUTION. Ya gotta love that.
Overall, price considered Illike this camera. Really anxious to see the 1DMark 3 successor though.
Sep 17, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Previous versions of BennyR's message #6177671 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
