PetKal wrote: Daan B wrote:
Looks like a landscape/commercial cam to me... 21MP is overkill for weddings and every day usage. It remains slow (FPS) and it seems the AF from the 40D/50D has found its way into the 5D2. So sports and wildlife shooting is out of the question also. Not as allround as I would like it to be. I think I will stick with my 1Ds3
One FPS slower than 1DsMkIII. Not a big deal, I reckon.
However, it wouldn\'t surprise me if the 5DII surpasses 1DsMkIII in IQ and high ISO performance.
I think Canon had to assert their prosumer FF camera IQ superiority today......that\'s where the 5D II should shine......if in the process they have to run over their flagship camera, well, so be it.......I guess they figure the 1DsMk IV should fix any bad feelings about that.
Nothing wrong with the IQ and high ISO performance of the 1Ds3. At least not for my usage. I don\'t shoot past ISO 1600 anyway (but ISO 3200 is still very usable). The difference will be in the digic 3 vs 4 since it seems both cams use the same sensor. I doubt the differences will be mind-blowing, if there are any. But we will see that when the 5D2 arrives in the stores, don\'t we?
Besides that, who needs mega high ISO performance in a landscape/studio cam anyway? It is not like the 5D2 is suitable for sports or wildlife shooting. And I hope the mediocre updated 40D AF will be accurate enough to get the most out of the 21MP\'s. If not, you just have a very big file with no more detail than a 10MP cam.
Canon choose to follow its old strategy... Put an awesome sensor in a crappy xxD body (regarding AF, FPS, weathersealing). Let\'s see where that is going to lead them with Nikon and Sony breathing in their necks
PetKal wrote: Daan B wrote:
Looks like a landscape/commercial cam to me... 21MP is overkill for weddings and every day usage. It remains slow (FPS) and it seems the AF from the 40D/50D has found its way into the 5D2. So sports and wildlife shooting is out of the question also. Not as allround as I would like it to be. I think I will stick with my 1Ds3
One FPS slower than 1DsMkIII. Not a big deal, I reckon.
However, it wouldn\'t surprise me if the 5DII surpasses 1DsMkIII in IQ and high ISO performance.
I think Canon had to assert their prosumer FF camera IQ superiority today......that\'s where the 5D II should shine......if in the process they have to run over their flagship camera, well, so be it.......I guess they figure the 1DsMk IV should fix any bad feelings about that.
Nothing wrong with the IQ and high ISO performance of the 1Ds3. At least not for my usage. I don\'t shoot past ISO 1600 anyway (but ISO 3200 is still very usable). The difference will be in the digic 3 vs 4 since both cams use the same sensor. I doubt the differences will be mind-blowing, if there are any. But we will see that when the 5D2 arrives in the stores, don\'t we?
Besides that, who needs mega high ISO performance in a landscape/studio cam anyway? It is not like the 5D2 is suitable for sports or wildlife shooting. And I hope the mediocre updated 40D AF will be accurate enough to get the most out of the 21MP\'s. If not, you just have a very big file with no more detail than a 10MP cam.
Canon choose to follow its old strategy... Put an awesome sensor in a crappy xxD body (regarding AF, FPS, weathersealing). Let\'s see where that is going to lead them with Nikon and Sony breathing in their necks
Sep 17, 2008 at 02:13 AM
Previous versions of Daan B's message #6176334 « Canon 5D Mark II master thread »
